![]() The indirect utility function, in contrast, assumes that the consumer has derived his demand functions optimally for given prices and income. There is another possible hitch to finding the inverse, however. In economics, a consumer's indirect utility function v ( p, w ) Note that the utility function shows the utility for whatever quantities its arguments hold, even if they are not optimal for the consumer and do not solve his utility maximization problem. In these cases, the forward power f degenerates to a constant function, with a graph that is a horizontal line. JSTOR ( May 2021) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message).Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.įind sources: "Indirect utility function" – news ![]() Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Where it can be shown that the coefficient of relative risk aversion is h and the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is 1/ e, which may be different from h.This article needs additional citations for verification. There is also ways of separating risk aversion within a period from intertemporal substitution. The simplest case would be to just let the period utility depend on current and the previous periods consumption, i.e.,Ī bit more general example, that can capture habit formation is due to Campbell and Cochrane, is to include a time varying habit or subsistence level x tin the per period utility functionĪnd let x tbe a function of previous levels of consumption, for example The assumption about time additivity is sometimes not appropriate. power function that exhibits constant relative risk aversion (CRRA). In this caseĪs you see, this is the inverse of the coefficient of relative risk aversion. So, let us compute the elasticity of substitution by only changing c 1. Then, changing c 1/ c 2 affects u’( c 2) only if it affects c 2. Value Value of the softmax function or its inverse (or their log). It also defines the log-softmax function and its inverse, both with a tuning parameter. The present functions define the softmax function and its inverse, both with a tuning parameter. Risk aversion and the elasticity of substitutionĬonsider the class of additively time separable homothetic utility functions. The softmax function is useful in a wide range of probability and statistical applications. Which is independent of the rate of time preference. Take an example when the per-period-utility is CRRA. In the additively separable case, this is clearly distinct from the elasticity of substitution since it has nothing to do with how changes in consumption affect marginal utility. This is rate at which future per-period-utility is discounted in the overall utility function. In and it is straightforward to define the rate of true time preference. These are examples of additive time separability, i.e., that the function F( c 1, c 2, c 3,…, c T) can be written. In the continuous time case, i.e., when the time period goes to zero this becomes Now let us calculate the intertemporal elasticity of substitution for a homothetic utility function. On the other hand, the quadratic and the CARA class are not homothetic. A widely used class of homothetic function is the CRRA class. Movement from point x, to any point on 0- a’ has the same effect on U ci/ U cj since the latter is constant along that ray. However, if we restrict attention to the class of homothetic functions, it is clear that the direction does not matter. In the figure, this means moving along the arrow pointing northwest, which is tangent to the indifference curve at x. One way out of this is to look at changes along the indifference curve, which would provide a compensated intertemporal elasticity of substitution. These different directions will, in general have different effects on the ratio U ci/ U cjand thus produce different elasticities of substitution. An increase of the ratio to the one given by the ray 0- a’, can, fore example, be done by moving along any of the three arrows in the figure. In the figure we want to see the effect of changing the ratio c i/ c j starting from point x. Then, since changing the ratio c i/ c j can be done in many directions, i.e., an increase can achieved by increasing c iand/or decreasing c j. The crux is that there is not a one-to-one mapping between the ratio of marginal utilities and the ratio of consumption. In general, however, is not sufficient to define the elasticity of substitution. The inverse of the number is the intertemporal elasticity of substitution. ![]() Compute the percentage change in the ratio of marginal utility at i and j that one percent change in the ratio of consumption at the same dates lead to. The intertemporal elasticity of substitution between dates i and j is an evaluation of ![]() In general, preferences over consumption (bundles) at different points in time should be represented by a utility function of the form ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |